Kristin Christoffersen Essays (224 words) - Igbo People, Ethnicity

Kristin Christoffersen Respects English pd 1 9/27/14 Ethnocentrism paper Ethnocentrism depends on the on the conviction that your way of life is the best; in this way it makes one gathering generalization another gathering. Ken Barger , an anthropologist with Indiana University, clarifies that it is Making a decision about different gatherings as inferiors to one's own, ( Barger 1). Thus, an individual will frequently pass judgment on somebody dependent on their experience or ethnicity without really knowing the person. Individuals are ethnocentric and don't understand it. Barger proceeds to demand, Everybody is ethnocentric, and it is highly unlikely not to be ethnocentric it can't be stayed away from Barger 1). Since we can't keep away from it, we most know about it. Our convictions an ethnocentrism originates from what we experience regular, and what we realize growing up. Being ethnocentric can influence the manner in which you think about an individual. Chimamanda Adichie shares her account of being a casualty of ethnocentrism and furthermore being a guilty party of ethnocentrism, All I had known about them was the way poor they were, with the goal that it had gotten unimaginable for me to consider them to be whatever else yet poor, ( Adichie 1). With just hearing one side of a story all Adicihie knew was what she thought to be valid and she made a decision about them dependent on her convictions.

Introduction to Christology

Freedom Baptist Theological Seminary Theo 530: Systematic Theology II Lesson 1 Dr. Daniel R Mitchell, Professor Introduction to Christology Contemporary Issues in Christological Method Overview Christ and History The Search Christology from Above versus from Below The Person or Work of Christ, Which is Prior? Christ and Myth I. Prologue to this Study A. Connection to other Theological Study 1 Theology Proper (over) 2 Man and Sin (beneath) Three Issues Addressed Here 1 Faith and History/Reason 2 Ontology versus Capacity 3 Myth and the Nature of the Biblical Witness II. Quest for the Historical Jesus Key Players: Strauss, Renan, Harnack Harnack’s Presuppositions NT and Superstitious Culture Ancient Miracle Claims are Commonplace Anti-supernaturalism Miracle Claims are Rooted in Ignorance Harnack and the Essential Message of Jesus The Kingdom of God and its Coming God the Father and the unbounded estimation of the human spirit The higher Righteousness and the Commandment of Love III. Scrutinize of the Classic Liberal Position A. Schweitzer, Search of the Historical Jesus in the NT is altogether Eschatological. It is Presumptuous for Moderns to attempt to Reinvent Him. Jesus was â€Å"wrong,† however his fundamental message isn't lost on the NT peruser. Kahler 1 Distinguished Historie and Geschichte 2 Contrasted â€Å"Jesus† of Historie and the â€Å"Christ† of Geschichte. IV. Above or Below? 1 Kahler’s Distinction prompted the inquiry: Which is priorâ€Historie or Geschichte? 2 The Neo-Orthodox Theologians, for example, Barth, Bultmann, and Brunner start with the Kerygmaâ€from Above (the NT witness). 3 Kasemann (â€Å"New Search†) and Pannenberg start with Historie (plausible facts)â€from Below. 4 Erickson needs to utilize both in unique strain. 1 Following Augustine he starts with confidence (from over) 2 He continues â€Å"from below† to test the dependability of his confidence given â€Å"hypothesis. V. The Person versus the Work of Christ The NT appears to Link these 1. (e. g. Messianic Mission and Divine Sonship) Classic Theology Separated them and Stressed Ontology (the Person) Reformers (Luther/Calvin) followed Classic religious philosophy, however accentuated the Soteriological hugeness (Work) of Christ. Current Theology Continued and Exaggerated this Distinction and Emphasis. Schleiermacher†â€Å"feelings† Bultmann/Tillichâ€â€Å"existential† question VI. Upsides and downsides of the Two Approaches Christology from Above Strengthâ€Emphasizes â€Å"Who† Christ is in assessing the noteworthiness of His Work. Weaknessâ€Tends to get hindered in philosophical inquiries, which have no importance to useful life. Christology from Below Strengthâ€Relevance to Life Weaknessâ€Driven by â€Å"felt needs† and Risks visual deficiency to Issues of Importance that are just made sure about â€Å"from above. † VII. Christ and the Incarnation Myth Bultmann and â€Å"demythologization. † Builds on the way of thinking of Idealism Links Christianity and World Religions Erickson’s Responses The Incarnation is a Mystery The Doctrine is Rooted in Jesus’ own Claims of Himself. The NT educating is completely extraordinary to the World’s Religions.

Multiple Sex Partners Indicates Trouble for Teens

Multiple Sex Partners Indicates Trouble for Teens Addiction Alcohol Use Binge Drinking Print How Multiple Sex Partners Shows Teen Risky Behavior By Buddy T facebook twitter Buddy T is an anonymous writer and founding member of the Online Al-Anon Outreach Committee with decades of experience writing about alcoholism. Learn about our editorial policy Buddy T Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on September 09, 2015 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on August 18, 2019 Image Source / Getty Images More in Addiction Alcohol Use Binge Drinking Withdrawal and Relapse Children of Alcoholics Drunk Driving Addictive Behaviors Drug Use Nicotine Use Coping and Recovery It probably comes as no surprise that teenagers and young adults who have multiple sexual partners are significantly more likely to develop substance abuse disorders than those who have not had sex with more than one person. What may surprise you is that this is more true for females than it is for males. But, that is exactly what research tells us. One of the largest studies of multiple sexual partners and substance abuse was conducted at the University of Maryland by Donna E. Howard and associates. The study focused on 3,288 teenage girls who were sexually active. Among these sexually experienced adolescents, 24% reported no sexual partners in the past three months, about 63 percent had one and 13 percent had two or more recent sexual partners. Substance Abuse and Other Risky Behaviors The study found that girls who have sex with more than one partner in a short period of time are likely to engage in other risk behaviors such as fighting, binge drinking, smoking cigarettes, using cocaine, or sniffing glue. Having sexual intercourse with multiple partners increases the risk of pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and resulting damage to reproductive health, the Maryland study found. Other studies have shown that girls are starting to have sex at younger ages, and an earlier start to sexual intercourse often leads to multiple sexual partner behavior. Besides fighting, drinking and substance abuse, girls with multiple sexual partners were also likely to have had unprotected sex the last time they had sexual intercourse, another dangerous behavior that compounds the risks of sex with many partners. Does Drinking Prompt Multiple Partners? Interestingly, Howards study found that as the teenage girls grew older they began to limit their sexual partners. Ninth graders reported more recent multiple sexual partner behavior, but the number of sexual partners declined for girls in the 11th and 12th grades. There is some disagreement among researchers about whether having multiple sexual partners is a factor in the later development of substance abuse disorders, or does the substance abuse increase the likelihood of having sex with multiple partners. Likelihood of Risk-Taking Some studies have shown a similar relationship in the reverse direction, that with frequent and heavy drinking, there is a greater likelihood of risk-taking, including having multiple sex partners. One study of 533 ninth graders across a 13-year period found that alcohol use was a leading indicator of changes in a number of sex partners throughout adolescence. But, the reverse pattern was not foundâ€"having multiple sexual partners was not linked to increased alcohol use. No Link to Depression or Anxiety However, a longitudinal New Zealand study examined the relationship between numbers of sex partners over three age periods (18â€"20, 21â€"25, and 26â€"32 years) and diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and substance dependence disorder at 21, 26, and 32 years. The results showed that an increasing number of sex partners was associated with a striking increase in later substance dependence disorders, especially for women. No consistent associations were found with later anxiety or depression at any age. Why Is Sex Linked With Substance Abuse? Researchers have speculated on the reason that having multiple sexual partners might be linked to developing later substance abuse problems. Here are some of the possibilities: Sexual risk-taking and substance abuse are common risk-taking behaviors in adolescence and young adulthood.Occasions of substance abuse are opportunities for sexual behavior due to disinhibition and lowered perception of risk.People are more likely to meet new sexual partners in situations in which alcohol is served and alcohol may facilitate multiple partnering.Something about having multiple sex partners puts people at risk of substance abuse disorders. Researchers speculate that it might be the impersonal nature of multiple partner relationships that prompts later substance abuse. Or, they say, perhaps having multiple failed relationships creates an attitude in which substance abuse is likely.

Civil Disobedience And Deliberative Democracy - 1550 Words

1 Introduction Civil disobedience encompasses the refusal to obey governmental laws or orders. This concept that is well known in the context of South African history. There are many examples present throughout history, especially in the new constitutional era, such as fees must fall. In this essay I will consider this concept of civil disobedience, especially in a South African context as well as considering a quote by Jurgen Habermas in an article by William Smith titled Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. Io will also look at philosophical theories such as liberalism and feminism in relation to the above move mentioned extract. 2 What is civil disobedience? According to John Rawls widely accepted definition of civil†¦show more content†¦Such acts of civil disobedience have become increasingly used by students at university campuses. Fess must fall was a student led protest that caught on in October 2015 which was in protest of the increase of fees of South African universities. The protests started at the University of Witwatersrand and quickly spread to other universities. This resulted in millions in property damage nationwide. Police were also sent in to deal with protesting students who didn’t hesitate to use force meaning many ending up injured. this was done with a group acting on behalf of the community to stand up for what they believed they were entitled to. Rhodes must fall was a protest that started at the University of Cape Town campus and was originally about the removal of the statue of Cecil Rhodes, which was said to be a reminder of the oppression suffered during the apartheid era. However, as the protest gained exposure it resulted in a wider call by students for the decolonisation of education nationwide. Students made use of occupation, civil disobedience and violence during the protests. The â€Å"free the nipple† campaign is a global movement aimed at bringing equality, freedom and empowerment to all, especially in areas of inequality of men and women. This argues that women should be able to bare their nipples in public. A Durban woman was recently sparked controversy for wearing anShow MoreRelatedHistory. From Slavery Until Now, Ghana Is Considered One1875 Words   |  8 Pagestrying to come up with political formulas that satisfy the needs of political democracy and economic development† (Martin O’Meara, p. 157). However, some of these Africa political or developmental problems are due to high debt, bad governing, and bad policy choices. As the first president of Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah was the head of the Ghanaian independence movement and an activist of nonaggression and civil disobedience. Kwame, who was fortunate to go to school in the United States, came home after

Analysis Of Salinger s The Catcher Rye - 3756 Words

Summer Reading-TASIS 2014 Rising 9th Grade Mainstream English The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger and Fahrenheit 541 by Ray Bradbury Please write a typed or handwritten response (200 words each in the language relevant to your course) to each of the following prompts on each of the works assigned for the course(s) you will be taking in 2014-2015: The Catcher in the Rye Initial Understanding: What are your thoughts and questions about the story? You might reflect upon characters, their problems, the title, or other ideas in the story. J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye is a very interesting sort of novel, as the entire book is the main character, Holden Caulfield, talking about part of his life to a psychoanalyst. This†¦show more content†¦That kind of stuffs happened to me about twenty times since I was a kid. I can’t stand it.,†(208) However he still â€Å"...sort of missed everybody I told about. Even old Stradlater and Ackley, for instance. I think I even miss that goddamn maurice.†(230) Holden is stuck between two of his needs: and isolation and companionship. Whenever he tries to address one he must inherently ignore the other. Interpretation: Choose two passages from the book that you think indicate an important change in the main character from the beginning of the story to the end. What do you think causes this change and how do the passages show this change? It’s very difficult to find passages containing changes in the main character in The Catcher in the Rye, because it is about Holden trying to resist change, trying to stay in the world of innocent world of childhood and out of the â€Å"phony† adult world. I researched the Robert Burns poem in the title that Holden misinterprets (Coming Thro’ the Rye), and it is actually a poem about casual sex†¦ (Isn’t that a nice song for children to be singing?) Holden sees himself as the â€Å"catcher in the rye,† saving all the children from falling off a cliff: â€Å"Anyway, I keep picturing all these little kids playing some game in this big field of

Can the British Be Proud of Their Empire Free Essays

Can the British be proud of their Empire? Britain had the largest empire in the world, by 1900. They were ruling an estimated 25% of the globe, but just because Britain had the most power, it doesn’t mean that they used it for the best. For example, Rani Lakshmi, was an Indian Princess and when her husband died the British took his land, and the natives had no say in the matter. We will write a custom essay sample on Can the British Be Proud of Their Empire? or any similar topic only for you Order Now The British also tried to change their customs even though they didn’t want them changed. The Indians tried to fight against the British and drive them out of India, but they failed. They also punished survivors and fired cannon balls through them at a close range! On the other hand, Mrs Mary Calvert, was a Christian Missionary and sailed to Fuji with her husband and tried to change the native’s ways, as they would chop someone’s fingers off if they stole something, or if a woman’s husband died the woman would have been strangled. So Mrs Mary Calvert changed the natives, so as Christians they would stop their terrible ways. But there were many people and tribes that the British helped but many were taken for advantage. Like Chief Lobengula. He was an African Chief and was asked by the British if they could use some of his land for gold mining, in exchange for tools and guns. But the British took it too far and stole more land, and used it to build mines and farms. The Chief tried to fight against the British, but they were killed, and they took all of their land. Lord Dalhouse, was a British politician, tried to develop the Indians way of life by building roads, railways, schools, and postal systems. He also tried to stop bad Indian customs, for example when a woman’s husband died she would be burnt. But he also made Indians follow the British way of life. Cecil Rhodes, was a businessman and went to live in South Africa and mined for gold, diamonds and other minerals. But crushed any African Tribes that got in the way. Chief Crowfoot, a Chief of a tribe in Canada refused to fight against the British, the Queen said thanks and built them a railway. But since the railway came there were more English people coming and very few of his people were left. Mary Prince was born in the West Indies, she became a poor black slave and was sold several times. Some masters whipped her and others abused her. One master took her to England in 1828 but she ran away. But when she left and tried to get a job, she was always given the worst, just like all blacks. I think that the British should be proud of their empire in a way, but I think the should be ashamed of what they have done too, because they haven’t always treated everyone in another country with respect or their customs and assumed that others should follow the British way of living. But because of that many tribes and cultures were destroyed. How to cite Can the British Be Proud of Their Empire?, Papers

Henry Vs Impact on the Hundred Years War free essay sample

Henry V’s most important accomplishment was that of the creation of the treaty of Troyes, according to C. T. Allmand, â€Å"This was the most important treaty of the Hundred Years War†. This treaty secured the French crown for the English, achieving the goal Edward III possessed when he first invaded France. Henry V had two major areas of impact, his first campaign into France in 1415, in which he captured a powerful tool in the form of the castle Harfluer. During the same campaign he won a decisive victory at Agincourt, smashing the French opponents even when heavily outnumbered. His other area of significance was his second campaign into France, in which he would eventually conquer all of Normandy and take the French crown for England. Henry V achieved all of the goals during his lifetime; he conquered and occupied all the northern areas of France. Most importantly though, is that he secured the throne of France for England. The Hundred Years War originated from a time where England was still a vassal state of France, requiring the kings of England to pay homage to the French crown. By the 1330’s, England had a strong sense of national identity, and during this time, England gradually came into a state of hostility with France, for which one of the main reasons was the dispute and friction over Gascony, a region in the south of France, which was under English rule. By establishing that England required paying homage to the French crown for Gascony created a tension between the two sides, as according to Orton, â€Å"England and France were nations growing apart†. When the king of France Charles IV – died, Edward III saw an opportunity to gain the throne of France. Edward claimed that he was the rightful heir of France, because he was the closest living relative to the deceased Charles IV (His mother being the sister of Charles IV, making Edward his nephew). The French crown was given to the cousin of Charles IV, who was Philip VI, and when Edward heard this, he declared war on France. The claim that Edward laid on the French crown was a great tool of propaganda for him; he could now wage war on the hostile nation of France. Now it did not appear that he was simply a rebellious vassal, instead, he could fight under the terms that he was denied his inheritance. Because of this, he could fight the French without appearing as a dishonourable king; he had a legitimate claim. By the time Henry V had ascended to the throne, two phases of the war had been fought, and twice had the two rivals made peace. The French, during the middle phase of the war, had unrightfully invaded lands around the area of Gascony that had been given to the English from the Treaty of Bretigny. His father, Henry IV according to Matusiak, â€Å"Had no burning ambition to secure the French crown, and during his reign, Aquitaine (Gascony) suffered from relative neglect. The war had moved, well and truly, towards more northern parts of France†. Henry V, two years after he ascended to the throne in 1415 renewed the English claim to the French crown. His main objective was the, â€Å"systemic conquering and occupation of the great towns and fortresses of northern France† (Encyclopaedia Britannica). He claimed, according to Barker, that the lands of Normandy and Gascony were his by inheritance and that they were withheld from him wrongfully and unrightfully. He demanded that the French not only give the English power over these lands, but an English Chronicle from the time indicates how he indeed demanded for the French crown himself, saying that it was his inheritance and his right and that it had been seized by violence and kept from him for too long. When the French refused his demands, he resorted to force of arms because, â€Å"It was his duty to recover them† (J. Barker). An English Chronicle indicates that because of the French refusal, Henry V would â€Å"Get help with the sword of Jesus†. This gave Henry what the people of England saw as a honourable and righteous cause to fight the French, not only was he denied of his rights and his inheritance, but because of this, he would get help in securing his ‘rightful’ throne from Jesus, meaning that the people saw him as the god appointed king of both England and France. The people of England because of this gave him full support. Henry V began his preparation by organising his financing of his projected invasion. He did this mostly through borrowing huge sums of money from other nations, and partly through taxation of England, â€Å"The generosity of which reflects his success in arousing national enthusiasm for the war† (Encyclopaedia Britannica). The French politically were divided into two factions, the Duchy of Burgundy, and the Armagnacs, who were in control of Paris and the Royal court at that time. Henry took advantage of this situation, according to Barker, â€Å"by simultaneously negotiating with both parties and offering his military services to the highest bidder in an effort to secure his rights and inheritances by diplomatic means†. This however is in contradiction of what an English Chronicle indicates, which is that Henry V, after being denied his demands for the French crown, invaded France with no negotiations with outside parties. The English Chronicle however, was written directly from an English perspective, and so it contains a bias for the English. The writer would not have put this information in because otherwise it would be negative propaganda value; instead the chronicle is depicting Henry to be a headstrong leader for England, not negotiating with the enemy who is unrightfully withholding his inheritance from him. Negotiations with the two parties of France failed and after this, he went to war on his own account, setting sail for Normandy with one thousand five hundred ships. Henry V began his invasion of France with the capture of Harfluer; a town at the mouth of the river Seine, which, according to Barker was a â€Å"strategically significant and powerful town†. Henry posted a garrison of one thousand two hundred men, personally commanded by his own uncle. His second action with Harfluer was to pack it full with English settlers and to emove many of the French people who lived there. Henry’s intentions were to turn Harfluer into a completely converted English town, in which it could serve as a base camp for launching future operations and invasions into France. This indicates how Henry was committed to his goal of completely conquering Normandy and France, and â€Å"compared to the spasmodic operations of England in France in the previous century† (Encyclopaedia Britann ica), his organisation and military strategy stood a much greater threat to the French then they had faced before. The capture of Harfluer was of great impact for the outcome of the Hundred Years War during Henry’s lifetime, as it served as the beginning point in which Henry would conquer all of Normandy, and eventually France. Although the capture of Harfluer was a success, it had taken much longer then expected, six weeks to be exact, and now Henry’s forces were tired and suffering from disease and illness. On 25th October 1415, the exhausted and diseased army of Henry V marched towards the English town of Calais. Intent on returning home to England to retrain and prepare for a second invasion of France, they pressed on, when a much greater French blocked its route, set on exacting revenge for the loss of Harfluer. An English chronicle records the size of the French army as one hundred and twenty thousand, while the English had only eight thousand men, most of these lightly armoured longbow archers. This number however would be heavily exaggerated as it is from an English primary source, containing a clear bias. More recent historians such as Barker, put the English numbers to around six thousand and the French number to be four to six times this number. By the end of the battle at Agincourt, â€Å"Thousands of Frenchmen were killed, including three royal dukes, eight counts and four of the most senior military officers in France. In stark contrast, the English had lost only two noblemen, a handful of men-at-arms and perhaps a hundred archers. † (Barker). In military terms, the great success Henry had achieved at Agincourt merely allowed him to escape the danger of being destroyed and pass to the town of Calais in safety. Politically though, its impact was enormous, observes Wilde. Not only did it portray him as a brave, chivalric military genius, which the people of England would follow loyally into a war, but it put the French into disarray, with a huge number of nobles and important military figures killed or captured by the English force. Not only this, but the victory destroyed much of the French army, and those that were not in the battle itself were afraid to face an enemy that eradicated a much greater foe in battle before. Instead they fought what appeared to be a much lesser foe: the opposing French faction. Proof of this is seen when in Henry’s later campaigns in France, when â€Å"Admittedly, warring between the French factions meant little national opposition was organised and Henry was able to keep resistance relatively local†. The success at Agincourt was a large part of Henry V’s impact on the events of the Hundred Years War, giving him an honorable name amongst his people, and one that his enemies feared. It put the French army into disarray and ensured that his future conquest was successful. Henry V’s campaign of 1415 was of great impact to the outcome of the Hundred Years War during Henry’s lifetime. Henry reopened the conflict between the French and the English, laying his own claim to the French crown as it being his inheritance. He successfully captured and occupied the town of Harfluer, a strategically important town, having access to inner France via the river Seine, which would be a major part of his 1417 invasion. He decisively defeated a French army that greatly outnumbered his own, striking fear into the people of France, and winning the hearts of his own people. The importance of the 1415 campaign was that it served as the beginning to which Henry would achieve the goal of defeating the enemy and becoming heir to the throne of France. Henry V’s huge success of his 1415 campaign was only the beginning of what would be the eventual conquest of Normandy and France. Barker considers the point that shocking victory at Agincourt had reverberated throughout Europe, and to all that this battle was seen as the confirmation that his cause had divine approval, and that God was on his side. Barker states â€Å"Henry was far too much of a realist ever to have imagined that the success of the Agincourt campaign would force the concessions he wanted from the French. Further military actions would be needed. † He began his preparations of invasion first off, by prioritizing the security of the captured town Harfluer, which had been under French attack and siege, both by land and sea. Relief came on 15 August 1416 when an English fleet defeated the French at sea and previsioned the town. Secondly, he managed to secure an agreement with the Duke of Burgundy that caused the Duke to not act in hostility towards the English cause. His continued possession of Harfluer and the neutrality of the Duchy of Burgundy indicate how Henry V was carefully plotting his invasion, leaving nothing to chance, and assuring that his first conquest of Harfluer remained as a foothold into Normandy. On 30th July 1417, the great invasion force set sail. His objective, described by Allmand and Barker was the conquering and occupation of all of Normandy, and to claim the crown of France. Henry V operated his invasion with great strategy, catching the French by surprise when he landed only 10 miles from the heavily supplied and garrisoned French town of Honfluer, which the French presumed he would attack, and then marched in the opposite direction to capture the castle of Caen. Caen was sacked and any opposition that had once been there was destroyed, the surrounding towns and smaller castles agreed to surrender. Soon after this, Englishmen were invited to settle in the town. The capture of Caen is described by Allmand as one of the most important, it being the first example of what Henry was planning for all of Normandy, how he planned to invade and occupy. After securing the neutrality from the Duchy of Brittany, he plunged into lower Normandy. His next target was Rouen, a powerful town on the river Seine. For six months did he starve out the city, when the French sent the starving women and children out of the city, â€Å"Henry remained inexorable. When asked to take pity on them, he simply replied that ‘they were not put there by my command† (Barker). This act of ruthlessness caused fourteen other neighboring towns and castles to surrender, fearing the same fate that those of Rouen had suffered. At this point, Henry was in control of almost all of Normandy, having achieved his first goal; he set his sights on the control of the French crown. The towns of Rouen and Caen, according to Barker, were â€Å"The two most important towns in Normandy†, and there capture led to many of the neighboring towns and castles to surrender without resistance and, less then a month after the fall of Rouen, he became the Duke of Normandy. Henry V was the first English king to have ever successfully conquered and held Normandy, and Curry speculates that he would have been content with this title, if it was not for the French’s attempt to reunite against Henry. Instead, he marched eastward down the river Seine, towards Paris. Henry V, after claiming the Duchy of Normandy, he once again set his eyes on the crown of France. After hearing the news of Henry’s coming, the royal court of France fled to the city of Troyes. It was here that the opposing faction – the Armagnacs, assassinated the Duke of Burgundy – John the Fearless. This ended any chance of a French unification against Henry (Barker), and the successor to John, who was Philip, reopened negotiations with Henry. The two parties agreed upon an entirely new structure of demands, this treaty was to be the â€Å"final peace† between England and France. The main terms were that Henry was to marry the daughter of the French king, Catherine Valois, and was to be heir to the throne until the current king Charles VI died. The Treaty of Troyes came to be known as the â€Å"Final Peace†, but historians such as C. T. Allmand oppose this, instead they consider that â€Å"the treaty did little to unite France, but served rather to underline the divisions which had existed for decades†. This was true, for while Henry had occupied much of Northern France, the son of Charles VI, Charles VII, still controlled much of southern and central France, and still considered Henry his enemy. This was the flaw of the treaty; it was a commitment for the war to continue between the two sides of Henry V, and Charles VII The treaty of Troyes remarks Allmand was the most important treaty of the hundred years war. It arranged a supposed peace between the English and French kings, and honoured Henry as heir to the French crown, which in future, his son would be come to known as king of England and France. Not only this, but it was a commitment for Charles VII to continue the war against England, one which he would eventually win after Henry’s death. Henry V made a significant impact on the outcome of the Hundred Years War. During his 1415 campaign, his capture of Harfluer and his incredible success at Agincourt secured the beginning of his incredible invasion of 1417. In which his systematic occupation and conquering of the northern towns and castles of France achieved. Finally though he achieved the goal that had begun the Hundred Years War, which was take control of the French crown, giving the power to the royal house of England. He had an incredible significance for the kingdom he ruled, Allmand states, â€Å"What Henry V achieved while living remains of immense significance for England and France. His actions during the war influenced not only the outcome during his lifetime, which was that of a complete English victory, which Allmand describes as being on such a scale that his predecessors had never done before. What he did as king also affected the complete outcome of the war even after his death. Allmand discusses his tunnel vision and long-term damage of his actions account to the eventual do wnfall of the English in France. His continual actions against France led Charles VII to exact revenge on his legacy, with the end result being the French victory of the Hundred Years War, and the capture of all English territory in France. Henry had a significant impact on the outcome of the Hundred Years War, his incredible victories and conquer of the French lands led to complete English success, and then complete English defeat after his death. Bibliography Wilde, R. (n. d. ) Henry V of England. [online] Available at: http://europeanhistory. about. om/od/famouspeople/a/personhenryveng_4. htm [Accessed: 7 Apr 2013]. The Hundred Years War: England and France at War C. 1300-c. 1450   By C. T. Allmand Henry V 2013. Encyclop? dia Britannica Online School Edition. Retrieved 26 February 2013, from http://school. eb. com. au/eb/article-3114 An English Chronicle of the Reigns of Richard II, Henry IV, Henry V, and Henry VI Written Before the Year 1471 Agincourt: The King, the Campaign, the Battle By Juliet Barker Conque st: The English Kingdom of France in the Hundred Years War   By Juliet Barker United Kingdom. Encyclop? dia Britannica. Encyclop? dia Britannica Online School Edition. Encyclop? dia Britannica, Inc. , 2013. Web. 11  Mar. 2013. lt;http://school. eb. com. au/eb/article-44821gt;. Curry, Anne (2005) Henry V’s conquest of Normandy 1417-19: the siege of Rouen in context. XXXI Semana de Estudios Medievales Estella 19-23 de Julio 2004, 237-254. Treaty of Bretigny  2013. Encyclop? dia Britannica Online. Retrieved 12 March, 2013, from http://www. britannica. com/EBchecked/topic/78946/Treaty-of-Bretigny Thomas Frederick, T, amp; J. R. L. , H 2012, Edward III. , Britannica Biographies, p. 1, History Reference Center, EBSCOhost, viewed 21 February 2013. Edward III 2013. Encyclop? dia Britannica Online School Edition. Retrieved 20 February 2013, from http://school. eb. com. au/eb/article-2029 United Kingdom 2013. Encyclop? dia Britannica Online School Edition. Retrieved 20 February 2013, from http://school. eb. com. au/eb/article-44808 Orton. The shorter Cambridge Medieval History 2. (p. 872)(Charles William Previte-Orton)